News
Pharma update | Apixaban patent and SPC provisionally held invalid
In its decision of 10 May 2022 in PI proceedings between Bristol-Myers Squibb Holdings Ireland Unlimited Company (“BMS”) and Sandoz B.V. (“Sandoz”), the PI judge of the District Court of The Hague denied BMS’ claim for injunctive relief regarding the sale of generic apixaban by Sandoz. According to the Judge, there is no inventive step
Read more ›
Pharma update | Dutch Court of Appeal: Pemetrexed patent Eli Lilly valid and infringed
In its judgment of 27 October 2020, the Court of Appeal of The Hague found that the generic pemetrexed tromethamine product of Fresenius Kabi Nederland B.V. (“Fresenius”) infringes EP 1 313 508 (‘EP‘508’), held by Eli Lilly and Company (“Lilly”). Yet again a turn of events in Dutch case law, where this issue has been
Read more ›
Pharma update | AstraZeneca ordered to compensate damage health insurer Menzis for enforcing invalid patent
In a groundbreaking judgment of 14 October 2020, the District Court of The Hague ruled that AstraZeneca AB (‘AstraZeneca’) must compensate health insurer Menzis Zorgverzekeraar NV (‘Menzis’) for having enforced a patent that was later invalidated. AstraZeneca owned European patent EP 0 907 364 (“EP 364”) for a sustained-release (XR) formulation of quetiapine, an active
Read more ›
Pharma update | Cross-border preliminary injunction granted regarding deferasirox
At the request of Novartis the Provisions Judge of the District Court of The Hague granted a preliminary injunction against Mylan BV for the alleged imminent infringement of Novartis’ paediatric extension (‘PE’) of Dutch SPC 300248 (‘SPC ‘248’) based on EP 0 914 118 (‘EP ‘118’).The product at issue contains deferasirox as the active ingredient
Read more ›
IAM Patent 1000 2020: BarentsKrans’ star is rising
IAM has just published the ninth edition of IAM Patent 1000: The World’s Leading Patent Professionals – a guide that identifies the top patent professionals in key jurisdictions around the globe. We are proud to report that recommendations from clients and peers have resulted in BarentsKrans’ IP & Technology team ascending to the silver category
Read more ›
Pharma Update | Tadalafil dose patent invalid: Court of Appeal confirms judgment 1st instance
The Court of Appeal of The Hague has confirmed the judgment in first instance, in which ICOS’ patent EP 1 173 181 B3 (‘EP ‘181’), claiming a 1-5 mg dosage range for tadalafil, was invalidated. EP ‘181 relates to tadalafil for the treatment of erectile dysfunction in a specific (low) dosage range. This finding was
Read more ›
Pharma update: pemetrexed tromethamine does not infringe pemetrexed disodium patent
In its judgment of 19 June 2019, the District Court of The Hague ruled that Fresenius Kabi’s pemetrexed tromethamine falls outside the scope of protection of Eli Lilly’s patent for pemetrexed disodium. This final relief decision deviates from earlier decisions in interim relief proceedings and decisions by several foreign courts. Eli Lilly (“Lilly”) markets the
Read more ›
Pharma update: injunction against generic combination of ezetimibe and simvastatin denied
In the interim relief decision of 11 June 2018 (ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2018:6802) in the matter Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. / Teva Nederland B.V, Pharmachemie B.V. and Centrafarm B.V. the Provisions Judge of the District Court of The Hague rejected the claim of Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. for an injunction against the distribution of the generic combination
Read more ›
Pharma update: tadalafil patent invalidated
The District Court of The Hague has invalidated ICOS’ patent EP 1 173 181 B3 (‘EP ‘181’) claiming a dosage range of tadalafil for the treatment of sexual dysfunction. Icos Corporation (‘Icos’), an Eli Lilly and Company subsidiary, distributes the medicinal product Cialis® containing tadalafil for the treatment of sexual dysfunction in adult men. EP
Read more ›
Pharma update: Indirect infringement of Swiss type claims is possible
In its judgment of 3 November 2017 in the case between Merck Sharp & Dohme (‘MSD’) and Teva, the Dutch Supreme Court ruled (ECLI:NL:HR:2017:2807) that indirect infringement of a ‘Swiss type’ second medical use patent claim is possible. In addition, the Supreme Court found that there is no difference in the scope of protection of second
Read more ›
